Officers REFUSED To Investigate This Crime

Turn Off Light
Auto Next

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Descriptions:

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Facebook: https://bit.ly/3fKIZF8

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Audit the Audit 2: http://bit.ly/2CD2b6j

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video:
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwv35xL9AFI
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlEBheo1EYw

Pinole Police Department response video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aazcJKfNjc0

Bay Area Transparency reaction video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYBbF5wzlpo

Bay Area Transparency’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2ihfkymxFFFrfc0kTy7q3w

Pinole Police Department’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9PRmfTmOZcAUvjbN97IC4A

Sources:

Adams v. Williams: https://bit.ly/37bgdMm

Illinois v. Wardlow: https://bit.ly/3rpkVxE

Alabama v. White: https://bit.ly/376GOtM

Florida v. JL: https://bit.ly/3u0zqKz

Article from the department: https://bit.ly/3rOcKv6

Other articles covering the same story:
https://fxn.ws/3rThUWJ
https://bit.ly/3b3JwSd
https://bit.ly/374XxNZ

Kansas v. Glover: https://bit.ly/3b28voD

People v. Casares: https://bit.ly/3d3twlL

People v. Cooper: https://bit.ly/3aZCRZ5

Jeffrey Crapko’s article: https://bit.ly/3beMNOH

Wilson v. Arkansas: https://bit.ly/3rI0Qm8

Hudson v. Michigan: https://bit.ly/3beS7Sb

California Penal Code 830.10: https://bit.ly/3beSaxl

Pinole PD policy manual: https://bit.ly/3rI1jEU

United States v. Sharpe: https://bit.ly/3rReK5t

United States v. Place: https://bit.ly/3aU9lUA

The Bane Act: https://bit.ly/3b1pUOw

California Penal Code 148(g): https://bit.ly/3tLUkwC

Sir Robert Peel’s principles: https://bit.ly/3rN04V1

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *